Russell Ackoff famously stated that “a system is not the sum of its parts, but the product of their interactions.”
This profound insight is a foundation for modern leadership. However, many organisations fail to apply this principle.
In my 10+ years as a consultant, I've observed teams and entire departments:
Suffering enormous levels of conflict
Paralysed with unmanaged dependencies
Engaged in detrimental business politics
These issues are the result of a lack of Interaction Design. And this leads to systems that impede rather than enable value delivery.
I coach Leaders to view organisations as cell-based structures, emphasising the significance of interactions between these 'cells'. Ackoff teaches us that the space between these cells (or work systems) is where the magic happens – or where conflict brews.
When we fail to design these interactions, we encounter:
Rampant conflict
Unpredictable delivery
Last-minute urgent work
A reactive stance to demand
Lack of collaboration and agreements
Siloed priorities without cross-system coordination
Instead, when we intentionally design our organisational interactions, we enable:
Enhanced transparency
Defined Business APIs
Effective Service Catalogues
The ability to anticipate demand
Clear agreements on interactions
Established Service Level Expectations (SLE)
The choice is clear. In the pursuit of Business Agility and sustainable environments, fostering productive interactions isn't just beneficial; it's essential.
Which one of these two types of interaction would you rather have in your organisation?